Comparing Forging, Casting, and Machining for Optimal Results 

comparing forging

Table of Contents

How do you decide which manufacturing process is best? Do you need high-strength parts or complex shapes? Are you concerned about precision or cost? These are critical questions every buyer faces when manufacturing processes like comparing forging, casting, and machining. Each method offers distinct technical benefits that affect product quality, cost, and production time. 

This blog will dive deep into forging vs casting vs machining, exploring the technical aspects that can help you make the right decision for your project. 

Forging – Process Overview and Technical Benefits 

Forging is a manufacturing process involving the deformation of metal under high pressure. This can be achieved through various methods, including: 

comparing forging
  • Hot Forging – Performed above the metal’s recrystallization temperature, allowing for significant deformation and minimizing the risk of cracking. 
  • Warm Forging – Conducted at intermediate temperatures, balances flexibility, and strength. 
  • Cold Forging – Executed below the recrystallization temperature, leading to improved strength due to strain hardening but requiring higher forces. 

Key Benefits of Forging 

Strength 

  • The mechanical properties of forged parts are superior due to their refined grain structure. When metal is forged, the metal grains are elongated and aligned in the direction of the working force. This grain flow improves tensile strength and fatigue resistance, making forged parts ideal for applications that require high performance under stress. 
  • Forged parts can exhibit a yield strength up to 26% greater than cast or machined parts. For example, the typical yield strength of forged steel can reach around 400 MPa, whereas cast steel might only reach 300 MPa. 

Improved Fatigue Resistance 

  • Fatigue failure occurs when materials experience repeated cycles of stress. Thanks to their uniform grain structure, forged parts can better withstand these cycles without failure. This property is particularly beneficial in applications like automotive crankshafts and aircraft landing gear, where components experience repeated loadings. 
  • Research has shown that forged components can endure up to 50% more fatigue testing cycles than their cast counterparts. 

Dimensional Accuracy 

  • Closed-die forging offers excellent dimensional accuracy. The dies used in this process are precisely machined to achieve tight tolerances, often around ±0.3 mm. This minimizes the need for additional machining, thus reducing manufacturing costs. 
  • The process also allows intricate features to be formed directly into the component, further enhancing precision and reducing secondary operations. 

Material Utilization 

  • Forging is highly efficient regarding material usage. By deforming the material rather than cutting it away, forging minimizes scrap. For instance, the material utilization rate in forging can exceed 90%, especially when producing large components. 
  • This efficiency translates into cost savings, particularly for high-volume production runs with significant material costs. 

In summary, forging is advantageous for applications requiring high strength, fatigue resistance, and efficient material usage. However, due to tooling and die design limitations, it may not be suitable for highly intricate shapes. 

Casting – Process Overview and Technical Benefits 

Casting involves pouring molten metal into a mold to create a part. The process can take several forms, including: 

casting process
  • Sand Casting – A traditional method used to form the mold. It allows for complex shapes but generally offers lower precision. 
  • Investment Casting – Also known as lost-wax casting, this method provides great detail and surface finish, ideal for intricate designs. 
  • Die Casting – Involves forcing molten metal into a mold under high pressure. It is suitable for the high-volume production of parts with an excellent surface finish. 

Key Benefits of Casting 

Complex Geometries 

  • Casting excels in producing parts with intricate shapes, including internal cavities and undercuts, that would be impossible to achieve with forging. This makes it ideal for manufacturing complex components like engine blocks, turbine housings, and decorative items. 
  • Casting can produce parts with up to 80% design complexities without additional machining. Automotive engine components, for example, are often cast due to their intricate internal structures that must be formed in one step. 

Wide Range of Materials 

  • Casting allows manufacturers to work with various metals and alloys, including those difficult to forge. High-melting-point materials such as titanium and specialty alloys used in aerospace can be efficiently cast. 
  • Casting is versatile because it can use ferrous and non-ferrous materials. For instance, aluminum die casting is commonly used in the automotive industry for lightweight components. 

Large Size Capability 

  • Casting is particularly beneficial for producing large parts. Large molds can be created to accommodate significant weight and size, which would be impractical for forging. 
  • Examples include large industrial machinery components, ship propellers, and heavy-duty construction equipment. 

Cost-Effectiveness for High Volumes 

  • While the initial costs for creating molds can be high, casting becomes cost-effective for large production runs. Once the mold is made, the cost per unit decreases significantly. 
  • In high-volume scenarios, the cost of casting can be as low as $0.50 per unit, whereas machining can run $2.50 or more per unit, depending on the complexity. 

In conclusion, casting is the preferred method for efficiently producing complex shapes and large parts. However, the mechanical properties of cast parts may not match those of forged components, particularly concerning strength and fatigue resistance. 

Machining – Process Overview and Technical Benefits 

Machining means removing material from a workpiece using tools such as lathes, mills, or drills. It encompasses several techniques, including: 

machining process
  • CNC Machining – Computer Numerical Control (CNC) allows for precise, automated control of machining processes, achieving high repeatability and precision. 
  • Conventional Machining – Traditional machining methods, like milling and turning, require more manual setup and control. 

Key Benefits of Machining 

Precision and Surface Finish 

  • Machining provides the highest degree of precision among the three methods. Tolerances can be as tight as ±0.01 mm, making it essential for applications that require high accuracy, such as aerospace components and medical devices. 
  • Achieving exceptional surface finishes (up to Ra 0.1 μm) reduces friction and improves wear resistance, especially in components like gears and bearings. 

Flexibility for Design Changes 

  • Unlike forging and casting, machining allows quick adjustments to the part design without expensive tooling changes. This flexibility is particularly valuable during prototyping or small production runs. 
  • Changes can be made on the fly, reducing time-to-market and development costs. 

Ideal for Small-batch Production 

  • Machining is advantageous for low-volume production, where the setup costs of forging or casting cannot be justified. The lack of mold costs means manufacturing can start immediately with CNC programming. 
  • Parts that require customization or specialized features are often best produced using machining methods

Post-Processing of Forged or Cast Parts 

  • Machining often serves as a secondary operation following forging or casting. After parts are forged or cast, machining can be used to achieve the desired tolerances and surface finishes. 
  • This combination of processes can enhance the final product’s quality and performance, ensuring it meets stringent industry standards. 

In summary, machining excels in precision, flexibility, and surface finish. However, due to its subtractive nature, it tends to generate more waste and can be slower and more costly for large-scale production. 

How to Choose the Right Process Based on Technical Needs? 

Choosing between forging vs casting vs machining depends on several technical factors. Here’s a breakdown: 

Strength vs Complexity 

  • Forging is best if your part needs to withstand high stresses or extreme conditions. Components like critical fasteners or suspension parts in automotive applications often rely on the superior strength of forged metals. 
  • On the other hand, casting is preferable for intricate designs, such as complex valve bodies in engines, where shape takes precedence over strength. 

Volume and Cost Considerations 

  • For high-volume production with significant part uniformity, casting or forging is often more cost-effective due to reduced labor costs per unit. This is particularly true in automotive and aerospace industries, where components are produced in large batches. 
  • Machining provides the flexibility and quick turnaround required if you only need a few specialized parts or prototypes. 

Precision Requirements 

  • Machining is essential, especially in aerospace or medical device manufacturing, if tolerances are critical. The ability to achieve tight tolerances and superior surface finishes makes machining the go-to choice for these applications. 
  • Forging may require secondary machining to meet specific tolerances, so consider your entire production process. 

Material Types and Properties 

The choice of material can also influence the decision. Some materials may only be available in certain forms suitable for specific processes. For instance, some high-performance alloys may be easier to cast than forge. 

Environmental Impact and Sustainability 

Consider the sustainability aspects of each process. Forging often uses less energy than casting due to reduced waste and the higher yield of usable material. Evaluating the environmental impact can play a significant role in your decision-making process. 

Conclusion 

In the battle of forging vs casting vs machining, the right choice depends on your needs, including the required strength, design complexity, production volume, and budget constraints. Each method has unique benefits and limitations, making it essential to analyze your project thoroughly. 

For expert guidance on selecting the best manufacturing process for your needs, contact Frigate today. Our team can provide insights tailored to your project requirements, ensuring you achieve the best results in both quality and cost-effectiveness. 

Having Doubts? Our FAQ

Check all our Frequently Asked Question

Which process offers better grain structure, forging or machining?

Forging compresses metal, aligning grain flow with the part’s geometry, enhancing strength and fatigue resistance. Machining removes material without affecting grain structure, limiting its strength benefits. 

What is the difference in tolerances achieved by casting and machining?

Casting can achieve tolerances within ±0.5 mm depending on mold quality and material. Machining offers tighter tolerances often ±0.01 mm due to precision cutting techniques like CNC turning and milling. 

Can I achieve isotropic properties in parts using casting or forging?

Forging creates anisotropic properties due to directional grain flow, enhancing certain mechanical strengths. Casting can produce isotropic properties if cooling and solidification are controlled uniformly. 

Does Frigate provide combined forging and machining services?

Frigate offers integrated forging and machining services, combining grain alignment from forging with precise final dimensions through CNC machining. This reduces material waste and improves part performance. 

What are the cost differences between forging and casting for high-volume production?

Forging costs include material and die preparation, suitable for small to medium runs. Casting spreads mold costs over large volumes, offering lower per-unit costs for bulk orders. 

How does Frigate ensure dimensional accuracy in forged parts?

Frigate employs secondary machining processes like turning and grinding to refine forged parts. Precise measurements during machining ensure tight tolerances meet your design requirements.

Which process is better for producing hollow parts, casting or machining?

Casting can produce hollow parts using sand cores or investment molds with complex geometries. Machining can create hollow sections but often involves higher material removal costs. 

Can Frigate assist with process selection between forging, casting, and machining?

Share your design details in our make-to-order form! Frigate evaluates your material properties, design requirements, and cost constraints to recommend the best process. 

What mechanical properties can be achieved with forging compared to casting?

Forging delivers higher tensile strength, impact resistance, and fatigue life due to grain alignment. Casting may offer similar strength but relies on controlled cooling and defect-free molds. 

How does Frigate handle material selection for these processes?

Frigate evaluates material suitability based on mechanical properties, machinability, and thermal characteristics. This ensures compatibility with forging, casting, or machining for your specific application. 

Make to Order

1
2
3
Picture of Tamizh Inian
Tamizh Inian

CEO @ Frigate® | Manufacturing Components and Assemblies for Global Companies

Check Out Our Blogs